Ajay Suresh
Chicago, IL

Ajay Suresh

I work on battery reliability at scale: the software, data, and operations that keep battery packs dependable after they ship.

CurrentlyBattery and vehicle systems R&D and AI engineering at Argonne National Laboratory.

Get in touchLinkedIn
Ajay Suresh

Six years in battery and energy systems, from a solar hardware startup in the Bay Area to a national lab.

Powerwall product reliability at Tesla: data-driven root cause analysis that cut escalation SLAs from months to days and contained the top 70% of fleet-wide hardware failures.

At Argonne, leading systems design and operations for the next generation of battery systems and engineers, with AI-native tooling projected to save ~$80k/yr.

How I got here

2024 – nowBattery systems R&D · AI engineering

Argonne National Laboratory

Led battery systems development and software validation for a DOE program where 12 university teams of students designed, built, and tested EV battery packs within production vehicles. Now building AI-native systems and operational tooling alongside battery and vehicle systems R&D (projected to save $80k / year in person-hour costs).

Model-based systems verification and fault-injection testing are unavoidable for safe battery pack development. Production safety-critical systems are increasingly software-defined, and require disciplined modeling and xIL testing.

In the Battery Workforce Challenge, teams were building and testing their first high-voltage battery packs. There was no shared infrastructure to prove that a student-developed BMS was safe to operate on real cells, and twelve teams inventing their own validation frameworks would have meant twelve different definitions of safe.

A student team with their finished pack

So validation became infrastructure. A staged framework took each team from bench-level tests through model- and hardware-in-the-loop validation to full-pack end-of-line and in-vehicle tests within just a few months. The test platforms were deliberately low-cost and repeatable (MATLAB/Simulink, CAN tooling, Python) to allow for team-defined flexibility with program-enforced rigor.

Debugging live signals under the lifted vehicle during pack integration and calibration

Teams built full battery packs with production-intent; the strongest ones completed validation across model, hardware, and pack level and went on to vehicle integration and calibration. Despite the accelerated timeline, we progressed multiple teams through pack-level testing, and impressed all industry partners including Stellantis’ CEO.

The program team with Stellantis' CEO and the production electric van
The Battery Workforce Challenge team with Stellantis’ CEO.

The frameworks we developed are now described in two IEEE ITEC+EATS 2026 papers, currently pending publication.

Candid video of wheels turning in a production vehicle, with a student-built pack for the first time.

Photos: AVTC.

2022 – 2024Chief Engineer · Project Manager

UC Davis EcoCAR

Built a team, program and organizational infrastructure from scratch, recruited and managed junior engineers, and executed the design, testing, and integration of a custom powertrain and autonomous stack into a production Cadillac LYRIQ.

V&V and model-based systems engineering is how a team doing something for the first time gets it done safely. It scales down as well as up.

UC Davis had been out of the national Advanced Vehicle Technology Competition series for fifteen years, and while I had industry experience, I had zero experience with vehicles before starting. The program had to exist before it could deliver anything: recruiting, garage and workspace setup; acquiring automotive-standard tooling, developing a safety and information-security regime, and integrating the digital workflows that coordinated complex vehicle development tasks amongst dozens of students.

Working underneath the LYRIQ on the lift, rear drive unit exposed

The engineering work ran on an adopted V-model. We embraced a detail-oriented approach to systems modeling, component, subsystems, and systems-level xIL testing, and a test-first approach even under a compressed timeline.

Our team scripted an undeniable turnaround on the national stage, going from placing 11th out of 13 teams in the first year to placing 5th overall and bagging over 8 awards across domains in Year 2. We also were one of the first few teams to get a vehicle working and on the road (video below)!

Our LYRIQ driving on a closed road with its custom powertrain fully integrated.
Tesla, 3500 Deer Creek Road
2021 – 2023Product and reliability engineering · Powerwall

Tesla

Product engineering on the Powerwall fleet: customer cases, failure analysis on returned units, install and commissioning quality, and telemetry-driven root cause analysis.

A deployed fleet is a source of engineering signal, not just a support queue.

A battery pack spends a majority of its life in the field, and problems arrive one support case at a time. Diagnosing each case in isolation does not scale, and it wastes what the fleet already knows: every unit reports the same telemetry, so one confirmed fault is a pattern you can go look for everywhere.

The working loop: starting from a single case and its data, forming a hypothesis, expressing it as a query the whole fleet can answer, correlating the hits against firmware versions, environmental factors, and usage, confirming against physical failure analysis on returned units, and leaving behind an automated containment system so the next occurrence is caught before a customer notices. Around that loop sat the physical half of the job: inspecting returned units, install and commissioning quality, and on-site debugging. I repeated this pattern across hundreds of customer cases, detecting and solving hardware, software, and manufacturing quality issues. Just within my first year, I brought our SLA for actioning support-team escalations from months to days, and coordinated countermeasures for the top 70% of fleet-wide hardware failures.

I also returned to Tesla while completing my master's degree to work the same problem from the design reliability perspective: test fixtures, automation, and the data and modeling pipelines that reliability decisions depended on. Both times, what the field taught me was key to informing future iterations of products.

The Tesla reliability team (2023)
Six-screen fleet-monitoring dashboard wall
2019 – 2021Junior hardware engineer

Solarlytics

First role out of school, at a stealth solar energy startup. Built a self-powered panel-instrumentation system end to end, from silicon to cloud.

Hardware becomes a system the moment its data leaves the device.

At a stealth startup where every engineer wore multiple hats, the instrumentation system had one owner, me (a new grad with no experience): working on circuitry and PCB, register-level firmware for our microcontrollers, secure connectivity, OTA updates, data infrastructure, and a full stack application that controlled our instruments and turned raw telemetry samples into waveforms someone could actually look at.

It is also where I learned that an instrument is only half the product. The value showed up when the signal left the device: high-frequency measurements published reliably enough to reconstruct remotely, and test automation that turned hours of board bring-up into minutes.

The through-line in my career has been a discipline: reliability engineered in software and data. Instrumentation that gets trustworthy signal off hardware, model-based design and testing that prove a system before it exists, and telemetry that keeps proving it after it ships. I learned the pieces and advanced the frontiers across solar hardware, electric vehicles, and the Powerwall fleet. Batteries are shipping into every sector while their reliability is still mostly firefought. The fix, I think, is battery systems that are software-defined: validated against their models before deployment, autonomously operated on their telemetry after.

Publications · Talks · Community

Publications
  1. [1]A. Suresh, D. Robertson, and S. Ebrahimnejad, “Structured Verification and Validation Framework for EV Battery Management Systems,” in Proc. IEEE ITEC+EATS, Detroit, MI, 2026, to be published.
  2. [2]A. Suresh, D. Robertson, S. Ebrahimnejad, N. Karthikeyan, and M. D’Arpino, “Modular Plant Model for Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing of Battery Management Systems,” in Proc. IEEE ITEC+EATS, Detroit, MI, 2026, to be published.
  3. [3]Volta Foundation, Battery Report 2025, contributed sections on BMS estimation and open battery-data repositories, 2025. volta.foundation
Talks and conferences
  1. [4]“Training the Next Generation of BMS Engineers,” The Battery Show South, Charlotte, NC, Apr. 2026.
  2. [5]Track chair, session chair, and paper reviewer, AVTC sessions, IEEE ITEC+EATS 2026, Detroit, MI, Jun. 2026.
Ajay presenting at The Battery Show South
The Battery Show South, Charlotte, Apr. 2026.
Community and recognition
  1. [6]Member, Workforce Readiness and Development Committee, Volta Foundation, 2026 – present.
  2. [7]Excellence in Leadership Award, EcoCAR EV Challenge, 2024.
  3. [8]Featured, “Where Are They Now: Ajay Suresh,” Advanced Vehicle Technology Competitions, Apr. 2026. avtcseries.org
Ajay's team on the awards stage with trophies at the EcoCAR EV Challenge
Excellence in Leadership Award, EcoCAR EV Challenge, 2024.

Questions I’d like to answer

  1. 1What should a deployed and connected battery system be telling you about its health?
  2. 2What are the degrees of autonomy software-defined battery fleets can operate under?
  3. 3How does battery data make the systems we build more reliable and sustainable?
Telemetrylive
cell V3.71
pack temp28°C
SoC76%
SoH94%
cycles312
What a pack reports is where every question above starts.
Now

Working on battery reliability at scale: what battery data should change about how packs are designed, validated, and operated. If you’re working near this, I’d love to compare notes!

Get in touch

Working across the battery and energy industry, from startups, OEMs and suppliers to a national lab, means I often know someone who can help, even when it isn’t me. If you’re building or operating battery systems, working on packs, BMS, validation, or looking for the right person in this field, write me. Happy to compare notes or make an introduction!

[email protected]